<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I like to fuck: weeks 1-6</title>
	<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/06/10/i-like-to-fuck-weeks-1-5/</link>
	<description>process metaphor | experiments in sound</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ockham</title>
		<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/06/10/i-like-to-fuck-weeks-1-5/#comment-18</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/06/10/i-like-to-fuck-weeks-1-5/#comment-18</guid>
					<description>great idea on the sixth iteration.  i rather like the buzziness of in the higher frequencies.  you've used one of the great features of FL that i wish other programs had.  i know cerebral's a big fan of that technique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great idea on the sixth iteration.  i rather like the buzziness of in the higher frequencies.  you&#8217;ve used one of the great features of FL that i wish other programs had.  i know cerebral&#8217;s a big fan of that technique.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: vauhztehq</title>
		<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/06/10/i-like-to-fuck-weeks-1-5/#comment-17</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/06/10/i-like-to-fuck-weeks-1-5/#comment-17</guid>
					<description>yeah, i hate to spill the beans on this one (its a well kept secret), but the phaser on the fifth iteration is a plugin called Mobilohm by Ohmforce. it is the most featureful phaser plugin i've found with a sound of pure liquid. I bought it when it first came out in 2002 then about a year later lost the registration code and my password for the site (and changed my email address) so i couldn't get it back, but I just recently  managed to get my hands on it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i hate to spill the beans on this one (its a well kept secret), but the phaser on the fifth iteration is a plugin called Mobilohm by Ohmforce. it is the most featureful phaser plugin i&#8217;ve found with a sound of pure liquid. I bought it when it first came out in 2002 then about a year later lost the registration code and my password for the site (and changed my email address) so i couldn&#8217;t get it back, but I just recently  managed to get my hands on it again.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ockham</title>
		<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/06/10/i-like-to-fuck-weeks-1-5/#comment-15</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/06/10/i-like-to-fuck-weeks-1-5/#comment-15</guid>
					<description>vauztehq, you've been quite busy!  
i took the liberty of uploading your tracks here, and adding the syntax for the player.  

out of curiosity, what's the granulizer you're using? it seems like you're getting some really high quality scrubs out of it.  
what's noticable in these 5 posts is your trajectory.  from abstract granular process to the kinds of things we would normally do to go about making our tracks, and then you went back to the granular.  

i'm rather a fan of the 4rth iteration where it sounds like you picked up more on that drone sound from the source.  and began using that for psuedo melodic elements.  

with the 5th iteration, there's a lot of phasing or flanging going on, can you talk a bit more about that process?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vauztehq, you&#8217;ve been quite busy!<br />
i took the liberty of uploading your tracks here, and adding the syntax for the player.  </p>
<p>out of curiosity, what&#8217;s the granulizer you&#8217;re using? it seems like you&#8217;re getting some really high quality scrubs out of it.<br />
what&#8217;s noticable in these 5 posts is your trajectory.  from abstract granular process to the kinds of things we would normally do to go about making our tracks, and then you went back to the granular.  </p>
<p>i&#8217;m rather a fan of the 4rth iteration where it sounds like you picked up more on that drone sound from the source.  and began using that for psuedo melodic elements.  </p>
<p>with the 5th iteration, there&#8217;s a lot of phasing or flanging going on, can you talk a bit more about that process?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
