<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 9weeks</title>
	<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks</link>
	<description>process metaphor | experiments in sound</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 1: A brief history of pop lyrics as sexual imagery by A Flock Of Seagulls &#187; Week 1: A brief history of pop lyrics as sexual imagery</title>
		<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/06/a-brief-history-of-pop-lyrics-as-sexual-imagery/#comment-3087</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/06/a-brief-history-of-pop-lyrics-as-sexual-imagery/#comment-3087</guid>
					<description>[...] Week 1: A brief history of pop lyrics as sexual imagery In contrast, the recent retro revival in modern music today, which references that era of music, are almost completely devoid of lyrical abstraction and in fact offer unusually concrete lyrics. Gwen Stefani is a good example, &amp;#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Week 1: A brief history of pop lyrics as sexual imagery In contrast, the recent retro revival in modern music today, which references that era of music, are almost completely devoid of lyrical abstraction and in fact offer unusually concrete lyrics. Gwen Stefani is a good example, &#8230; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 2: Virtual Retro! by ockham</title>
		<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/22/week-2-virtual-retro/#comment-43</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 02:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/22/week-2-virtual-retro/#comment-43</guid>
					<description>hhahahahahahhahahah, totally rad!  impOscar too!  i love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hhahahahahahhahahah, totally rad!  impOscar too!  i love it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week one: initial impression in sound by ockham</title>
		<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/07/week-one-initial-impression-in-sound/#comment-42</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 03:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/07/week-one-initial-impression-in-sound/#comment-42</guid>
					<description>matt, really nice.  i'm loving the melody that creeps in during the break and wraps it back into place.  you've got my head knock knocking.

cheers indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>matt, really nice.  i&#8217;m loving the melody that creeps in during the break and wraps it back into place.  you&#8217;ve got my head knock knocking.</p>
<p>cheers indeed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week one: initial impression in sound by Vauztehq</title>
		<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/07/week-one-initial-impression-in-sound/#comment-41</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 00:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/07/week-one-initial-impression-in-sound/#comment-41</guid>
					<description>holy snap that is the hottest. Nice catch Matt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>holy snap that is the hottest. Nice catch Matt!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week one: initial impression in sound by TheChisa</title>
		<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/07/week-one-initial-impression-in-sound/#comment-40</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/07/week-one-initial-impression-in-sound/#comment-40</guid>
					<description>Cliff, I think it's safe to say... you've got the Midas Touch:

http://www.genericorp.net/~matt/9weeks/midas.mp3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cliff, I think it&#8217;s safe to say&#8230; you&#8217;ve got the Midas Touch:</p>
<p><a href='http://www.genericorp.net/~matt/9weeks/midas.mp3' rel='nofollow'>http://www.genericorp.net/~matt/9weeks/midas.mp3</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 1: A brief history of pop lyrics as sexual imagery by Vauztehq</title>
		<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/06/a-brief-history-of-pop-lyrics-as-sexual-imagery/#comment-38</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 05:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/06/a-brief-history-of-pop-lyrics-as-sexual-imagery/#comment-38</guid>
					<description>Good start! It really put me into a solid mindset for the project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good start! It really put me into a solid mindset for the project.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 1: A brief history of pop lyrics as sexual imagery by ockham</title>
		<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/06/a-brief-history-of-pop-lyrics-as-sexual-imagery/#comment-37</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/06/a-brief-history-of-pop-lyrics-as-sexual-imagery/#comment-37</guid>
					<description>chisa, i'll try to see if there's a more &quot;friendly&quot; formating utility for WP (i'll message you later to see what the problem was); WP isn't exactly the fastest CMS i've come across, and i'll probably switch over to drupal.  in the meantime, i like the connections you're making between the 80's and the communications boom, as i like to call it.  the &quot;information age&quot; sounds way to capitalist for my liking.  information is something that can be bought and sold, communication is the means through which it is transfered, which can only be controlled through access.  that's just my flavor on the topic.  

i'll get to work on my own sometime this week... i'm feeling some depeche mode action is in due course.  i personally find it interesting how the communications boom is congruent with the explosion of midi technology.  and perhaps, riffing off of your present idea, so was an upsurge in S&amp;#38;M fettish-wear from the beginnings of the industrial music era.  this coincided with the entrance of digital sampling.  it's almost a shame burroughs couldn't hear what's happened since the mid 90's.  he'd be astonished.  

ok, that was really convoluted.  i'll have to clarify later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chisa, i&#8217;ll try to see if there&#8217;s a more &#8220;friendly&#8221; formating utility for WP (i&#8217;ll message you later to see what the problem was); WP isn&#8217;t exactly the fastest CMS i&#8217;ve come across, and i&#8217;ll probably switch over to drupal.  in the meantime, i like the connections you&#8217;re making between the 80&#8217;s and the communications boom, as i like to call it.  the &#8220;information age&#8221; sounds way to capitalist for my liking.  information is something that can be bought and sold, communication is the means through which it is transfered, which can only be controlled through access.  that&#8217;s just my flavor on the topic.  </p>
<p>i&#8217;ll get to work on my own sometime this week&#8230; i&#8217;m feeling some depeche mode action is in due course.  i personally find it interesting how the communications boom is congruent with the explosion of midi technology.  and perhaps, riffing off of your present idea, so was an upsurge in S&amp;M fettish-wear from the beginnings of the industrial music era.  this coincided with the entrance of digital sampling.  it&#8217;s almost a shame burroughs couldn&#8217;t hear what&#8217;s happened since the mid 90&#8217;s.  he&#8217;d be astonished.  </p>
<p>ok, that was really convoluted.  i&#8217;ll have to clarify later.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 1: A brief history of pop lyrics as sexual imagery by TheChisa</title>
		<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/06/a-brief-history-of-pop-lyrics-as-sexual-imagery/#comment-36</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/08/06/a-brief-history-of-pop-lyrics-as-sexual-imagery/#comment-36</guid>
					<description>I want to say, for the record, that it took me two hours to format a post that would have taken me ten minutes in PICO.

I fucking hate WordPress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to say, for the record, that it took me two hours to format a post that would have taken me ten minutes in PICO.</p>
<p>I fucking hate WordPress.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 9 weeks project #2: Image-to-Sound by ockham</title>
		<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/07/05/9-weeks-project-2-image-to-sound/#comment-35</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 19:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/07/05/9-weeks-project-2-image-to-sound/#comment-35</guid>
					<description>cnnr,

Welcome, on the left menu bar click on &quot;register&quot;.  Load in your info.  And I'll grant you contributor status.  I'll send you an email once this is done.  Great to have your interest.  Good luck in NY, it's a great place to be.  Definately swing down to Chelsea when you get the time and check out the galleries around 20th and 21st.

Feel free to email me with any questions you might have.

Cheers,
Ockham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cnnr,</p>
<p>Welcome, on the left menu bar click on &#8220;register&#8221;.  Load in your info.  And I&#8217;ll grant you contributor status.  I&#8217;ll send you an email once this is done.  Great to have your interest.  Good luck in NY, it&#8217;s a great place to be.  Definately swing down to Chelsea when you get the time and check out the galleries around 20th and 21st.</p>
<p>Feel free to email me with any questions you might have.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Ockham
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 9 weeks project #2: Image-to-Sound by cnnr</title>
		<link>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/07/05/9-weeks-project-2-image-to-sound/#comment-34</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ockham-sound.com/9weeks/2006/07/05/9-weeks-project-2-image-to-sound/#comment-34</guid>
					<description>Hi, I just moved to NY from Ireland and stumbled on your site today. I'd love to get involved with this project. I'm probably not posting in the right are but let me know how I can get involved.
Thanks
cnnr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I just moved to NY from Ireland and stumbled on your site today. I&#8217;d love to get involved with this project. I&#8217;m probably not posting in the right are but let me know how I can get involved.<br />
Thanks<br />
cnnr
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
